Page 30 - Наукові записки Державного природознавчого музею, 2023 Вип. 39

28 Новіков А. В., Гуштан Г. Г., Гуштан К. В., Кузярін О. Т. …

Karim T.S., Burkhalter R., Farrell Ú.C., Molineux A., Nelson G., Utrup J., Butts S.H. 2016.
Digitization workflows for paleontology collections. Palaeontologia Electronica. Vol. 19 No. 3.
P. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26879/566
Knouft J.H. 2018. Appropriate application of information from biodiversity databases is critical when
investigating species distributions and diversity: a comment on Dallas et al. (†). Ecology Letters.
Vol. 21 No. 7. P. 1119–1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12959
Lane M.A. 1996. Roles of natural history collections. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. Vol.
83 No. 4. P. 536–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2399994
Lister A.M., Climate Change Research Group. 2011. Natural history collections as sources of long-
term datasets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol. 26 No. 4. P. 153–154. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.009
Liu H., Wei J., Yang T., Mu W., Song B., Yang T., Fu Y., Wang X., Hu G., Li W., Zhou H., Chang
Y., Chen X., Chen H., Cheng L., He X., Cai H., Cai X., Wang M., Li Y., Sahu S.K., Yang J.,
Wang Y., Mu R., Liu J., Zhao J., Huang Z., Xu X., Liu X. (2019). Molecular digitization of a
botanical garden: high-depth whole-genome sequencing of 689 vascular plant species from the
Ruili Botanical Garden. GigaScience. Vol. 8 No. 4. Article giz007. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz007
Mallott E.K., Garber P.A., Malhi R.S. 2018. trnL outperforms rbcL as a DNA metabarcoding marker
when compared with the observed plant component of the diet of wild white-faced capuchins
(Cebus capucinus, Primates). PLOS ONE. Vol. 13 No. 6. Article e0199556. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199556
Miller S.E., Barrow L.N., Ehlman S.M., Goodheart J.A., Greiman S.E., Lutz H.L., Misiewicz T.M.,
Smith S.M., Tan M., Thawley C.J., Cook J.A., Light J.E. 2020. Building natural history
collections for the twenty-first century and beyond. BioScience. Vol. 70 No. 8. P. 674–687. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa069
Mosyakin S.L., Shiyan N.M. 2022. The MG Kholodny Institute of Botany and the National
Herbarium of Ukraine (KW), Kyiv: Damage due to the missile strikes on 10 October 2022
[online]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal. Vol. 79 No. 5. P. 339–342. Available at: <
https://ukrbotj.co.ua/archive/79/5/339> [Accessed 2 October 2023]
Nash T.H., Brinda J. 2012. Digitizing North American lichen and bryophyte specimens in US
institutions. Evansia. Vol. 29 No. 4. P. 115–115.
Nelson G., Ellis S. 2019. The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on
biodiversity research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Vol. 374 No. 1763,
Article 20170391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0391
Novikov A. 2019. Digitization of natural collections – the way to immortality // Proceedings of
the 14th International Young Scientists' Conference “Biology: From a Molecule Up to the
Biosphere” (27–29 November 2019, Kharkiv, Ukraine). V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National
University. P. 12–14.
Novikov A., Sup-Novikova M. 2021. Simple and cheap photosystem for herbarium digitization. Plant
Introduction. Vol. 91/92. P. 50–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46341/PI2021015
O'Connell A.F., Gilbert A.T., Hatfield J.S. 2004. Contribution of natural history collection data to
biodiversity assessment in national parks. Conservation Biology. Vol. 18 No. 5. P. 1254–1261.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00034.x-i1
Pennock H. 2017. Natural history museum security, in E. Dorfman (ed.), The future of museum of
natural history. Routledge. P. 49–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315531892-4