Page 17 - Proceedings of the State Natural History Museum. Issue 37 (Lviv, 2021)
P. 17

16                            Чернобай Ю.М.

                                    28. Randall A. Human Preferences, Economics, and the Preservation of Species // Norton B.G. (Ed.).
                                       The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity. – Princeton: Princeton University
                                       Press, 1986. – P. 79-109.
                                    29. Staaf H., Berg B. Mobilization nutrients in a Scots pine forests mor in Central Sweden // Silva
                                       Fennica. – 1977. – № 3. – P. 210-217.
                                    30. Stoyko S. Characteristics of virgin forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians and their significance as
                                       an ecological model for natural forest management// Natural Forests in the Temperate Zone of
                                       Europe.  –  Values  and  utilisation.  Published  by  Federal  Institute  WSL,  Birmensdorf  and
                                       Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Rakhiv, 2005. – Р. 423-430.
                                    31. Tasenkevich L., Kruhlov I., Kalinovich N.,Inkin E., Puka E., Chernobay Y., Veen P. Inventory
                                       of Grasslands of the Ukrainian Carpathians. – Lviv : SNHM, 2012. – 88 p.

                                   Державний природознавчий музей НАН України, м. Львів
                                   e-mail: chernobajjurij46@gmail.com

                                   Chernobay Yu.
                                   Deductive museumization of the phytodetritus component of forest community
                                      Detritus, in particular litter, turf and peat strata, silt along streams, as well as benthos, are systemic
                                   formations that can be differentiated into both elements and components. As an independent indicator
                                   of  structural and functional indicator, litter-falling coefficient (LFC)  -  acts only up to the level of
                                   biogeocenosis.  The  suprabiogeocenotic  (landscape)  level  is  not  a  simple  or  weighted  sum  of
                                   biogeocenotic estimates. This should be a network integration of biogeochemical flows, where whole
                                   biogeocenoses can act as barrier systems. Therefore, the LFC indicator cannot be averaged for the
                                   landscape, but the indicators of anisotropy, dispersion, or chorology can be used, which can be reduced
                                   to a point indication (rating) of the ecosystem. The priority role of litter in the small biotic cycle is due
                                   to the fact that in natural ecotopes developed an effective mechanism of heterotrophic utilization of
                                   dead biomass. Due to this, the intensity of litter decomposition, estimated by the value of LFC, can be
                                   used to diagnose the stability of the ecotope. For the cycle of substances and the flow of energy, forest
                                   litter serves as a reserve fund, which ensures the stability of the ecosystem. From the point of view of
                                   system organization, the litter is a structural layer (detrital biogeohorizon). Therefore, litter  as a bio-
                                   mineral formation can be considered from different positions - as part of the soil profile, or subsystem
                                   of the soil system, as an independent biogeocenotic body (as a system) and as a component link in the
                                   system  of  biogeocenoses.  Detrital  diagnostics  allows  to  fairly  objectively  assess  the  risks  to  the
                                   continued existence of forests in an unstable buffer environment. With the help of these criteria it is
                                   possible to identify the direction of changes in sustainability indicators, which is extremely important
                                   in the early stages of decision-making on further plans to optimize and strengthen the buffer structures
                                   of forest community.
                                      Key  words:  museumization,  phytodetritis,  litter,  soils,  forest  habitats,  meadows,  ecotones,
                                   coevolution, integrity.
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22