Page 145 - Наукові записки ДПМ. Т 35/2019

Проблемно-аналітична база даних "Інвазійні види": структура, функції … 139

26. Garcıa-Ramos G., Rodrıguez D. Evolutionary speed of species invasions // Evolution. – 2002. –
V. 56. – Р. 661- 668.
27. Ghalambor C.K., McKay K. Carroll S.P., Reznik D.N. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic
plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments // Functional
Ecology – 2007. – V. 21. – Р. 394-407.
28. Godoy O., Saldana A., Fuentes N., Valladares F. & Gianoli E. Forests are not immune to plant
invasions: phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation allow Prunella vulgaris to colonize a
temperate evergreen rainforest // Biological Invasions. – 2010. – V. 13. – Р. 1615-1625.
29. Grossman, J.D., Rice, K.J. Contemporary evolution of an invasive grass in response to elevated
atmospheric CO2 at a Mojave desert FACE site // Ecology Letters. – 2014. – V. 17. –
Р. 710-716.
30. Gurevitch J., Padilla D.K. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? // Trends Ecology
Evolution. – 2004. – V. 19. – P. 470-474.
31. Hellmann J.J, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG et al. Five potential consequences of climate change for
invasive species // Conservation Biology Journal. – 2008. – V. 22. – P. 534-543.
32. Hendry A.P., Kinnison M.T. Perspective: the pace of modern life: measuring rates of
contemporary microevolution // Evolution. – 1999. – V. 53. – Р. 1637-1653.
33. Hereford J. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness tradeoffs // The American
Naturalist. – 2009. – V. 173. – Р. 579 588.
34. Hoeksema J.D., Forde, S.E. A meta-analysis of factors affecting local adaptation between
interacting species // The American Naturalist. – 2008. – V. 171. – Р. 275-290.
35. Kilkenny F.F., Galloway, L.F. Adaptive divergence at the margin of an invaded range //
Evolution. – 2013. – V. 67. – Р. 722-731.
36. Lachmuth S., Durka W., Schurr F.M. Differentiation of reproductive and competitive ability in
the invaded range of Senecio inaequidens: the role of genetic аllee effects, adaptive and non
adaptive evolution // The New Phytologist. – 2011. – V. 192. – Р. 529-541.
37. Lambrinos J.G. How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary
invasion dynamics // Ecology. – 2004. – V. 85. – Р. 2061-2070.
38. Lande R. Genetics and demography in biological conservation // Science. – 1988. – V. 241. –
Р. 1455-1460.
39. Lee C.E. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. – 2002. –
V. 17. – Р. 386-391.
40. Leger E.A. & Rice K.J. Assessing the speed and predictability of local adaptation in invasive
California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. – 2007. –
V. 20. – Р. 1090-1103.
41. Leger E.A., Espeland E.K., Merrill, K.R., Meyer S.E. Genetic variation and local adaptation at a
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) invasion edge in western Nevada // Molecular Ecology. – 2009. –
V. 18. – Р. 4366-4379.
42. Leimu R., Mutikainen P., Koricheva J., Fischer M. How general are positive relationships
between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? // Journal of Ecology. – 2006. –
V. 94. – P. 942-952.
43. Linder M., Fitzgerald J.B., Zimmermann N.E., Reyer C., Delzon S., Van der Maaten E., Schelhass
M.-J., Lasch P., Eggers J., Van der Maaten-Theunissen M., Suckow F., Promas A., Poulter B.,
Hanewinkel M. Climate change and European forests: What do we know, what are the
uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? // Journal of Environmental
Management. – 2014. – V. 146 (12). – Р. 69-83.