Page 144 - Наукові записки ДПМ. Т 35/2019

138 Малиновський А.К.

7. Blossey B., Notzold R. Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous
Plants: A Hypothesis // Journal of Ecology. – 1995. –V. 83, N. 5. – Р. 887-889.
8. Bussotti F., Pollastrini M., Holland V., Bruggeman W. Functional traits and adaptive capacity of
European forests to climate change // Environmental and Experimental Botany. – 2015.– 111(3).
– Р. 91-113.
9. Chown St., Hodgins K A., Griffin P.C., Oakeshott J.G., Byrne M., Hoffmann A.A. Biological
invasions, climate change and genomics // Evolutionary Applications. – 2015. – V. 8 (1). –
P. 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12234
10. Chun Y.J., Collyer M.L., Moloney K.A., Nason J.D. Phenotypic plasticity of native vs. invasive
purple loosestrife: a two-state multivariate approach // Ecology. – 2007 – V. 88 – Р. 1499-1512.
11. Colautti R., Barrett Sp. Rapid Adaptation to Climate Facilitates Range Expansion of an Invasive
Plant // Science. – 2013. – Р. 364-366.
12. Colautti, R. & Lau, J.A. Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation,
natural selection, and local adaptation // Molecular Ecology. – 2015 – V. 24. – Р. 1999-2017.
13. D’Antonio, C. & Meyerson, L.A. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological
restoration: a synthesis // Restoration Ecology. – 2002. – V. 10. – Р. 703-713.
14. Davidson A.M., Jennions M, Nicotra A.B. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity
than native species and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis // Ecology Letters. – 2011. – V. 14.
– Р. 419-431.
15. Davis M.B., Shaw R.G. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change //
Science. – 2011. – V. 292. – Р. 673-679.
16. De Clercq P., Mason P.G., Babendreier D. Benefits and risks of exotic biological control agents
// BioControl. – 2011. – V. 56. – P. 681-698.
17. Dlugosch K.M., Parker I.M. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive
evolution, and the role of multiple introductions // Molecular Ecology. – 2008. – V. 17. –
Р. 431-449.
18. Dukes J.S., Mooney H.A. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? //
Trends Ecology and Evolution – 1999. – V. 14 – P. 135-139.
19. Ellstrand N.C., Elam, D.R. Population genetic consequences of small population size:
implications for plant conservation // Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics – 1993. –
V. 24. – Р. 217-242.
20. Etterson J.R., Shaw R.G. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming //
Science – 2001. – V. 294. – Р.151-154.
21. Facon B., Genton B.J., Shykoff J., Jarne P., Estoup, A., David P. A general eco-evolutionary
framework for understanding bioinvasions // Trends in Ecology and Evolution, – 2006. – V. 21.
– P. 130-135.
22. Felker-Quinn E., Schweitzer J.A., Bailey J.K. Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant
species but little support for Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA) // Ecology and
Evolution. – 2013. – V. 3(3) – Р. 739-751.
23. Fernandes P., Antunes C., Correia O., Maguas C. Do climatic and habitat conditions affect the
reproductive success of an invasive tree species? An assessment of the phenology of Acacia
longifolia in Portugal // Plant Ecology – 2015. – V. 216. – P. 343-355.
24. Finnegan E.J. Epialleles - a source of random variation in times of stress. // Current Opinion in
Plant Biology. – 2002. – V. 5. – P. 101-106.
25. Fowler S.V., Paynter Q., Dodd S., Groenteman R. How can ecologists help practitioners minimize
non-target effects in weed biocontrol? // Journal of Applied Ecology. – 2012. –V. 49 – P. 307-
310.