UA EN
 
/
/
Обкладинка т. 33 Обкладинка т. 33 зворот

Download all articles
Download article
  Yavornytska O.V., Chernobay Yu.M. Studying about soil mesofauna succession as a way of monitoring anthropogenic habitat fragmentation // Proc. of the State Nat. Hist. Mus. - Lviv, 2017. - 33. - P. 175-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36885/nzdpm.2017.33.175-180 Key words: Succession, fragmentation, community, soil invertebrata, mesofauna The problems of spatial fragmentation of ecosystems under anthropogenic influence is considered. The estimate processes that initiate fragmentation. Found that research and monitoring of the phenomenon of succession is important in the study of invasive species, and shows how the species diversity is changing over time. The study compared the rate of formation of soil biota in primary successions and demutation allows to detect typical grops of soil invertebrates mesofauna wich is specific to individual stages of succession.  
References
  1. Bilonoha V.M. Vplyv frahmentatsii na strukturno-funktsionalnu orhanizatsiiu populiatsii roslyn // Nauk. zap. Derzh. pryrodozn. muzeiu. – Lviv, 2015. – Vyp. 31. – S. 73-80. [In Ukrainian]
  2. Holubets M.A., Maryskevych O.H., Krok B.O., Kozlovskyi M.P., Bashta A.-T.V., Hnativ P.S., Hrynchak M.M., Shpakivska I.M., Yavornytskyi V.I. Ekolohichnyi potentsial nazemnykh ekosystem. – Lviv: Polli, 2003. – 180 s. [In Ukrainian]
  3. Gusev A.P. Suktcessionnaia sistema kak osnova fitoindikatcii dinamiki landshaftov (na primere Polesskoi landshaftnoi provintcii) // Prirodnye resursy, 2008. – № 2. – S. 51 -62. [In Russian]
  4. Gusev A.P. Otcenka riska narusheniia ekologicheskogo ravnovesiia po fitoindikatcionnym kriteriiam // Prirodopolzovanie: sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 15 / NAN Belarusi; In-t prirodopolzovaniia NAN Belarusi; redkol: A.K. Karabanov (gl. red.) [i dr.]. – Minsk: In-t prirodopolzovaniia NAN Belarusi, 2009. – S. 128-133. [In Russian]
  5. Gusev A.P. Fitoindikatcionno-geoekologicheskii analiz dinamiki geosistem: teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy // Vest. Viteb. gos. un-ta, 2010. – № 2 (56). – S. 84-89. [In Russian]
  6. Gusev A.P. Potentcial samovosstanovleniia geosistem i ego otcenka na osnove fitoindikatcii // Vest. Belorus. gos. un-ta. Ser. 2. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 77-81. [In Russian]
  7. Gusev A.P. Zachem nuzhno izuchat suktcessii? // Geograficheskie aspekty ustoichivogo razvitiia regionov: Mat-ly Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Ch. 1. – Gomel: GGU im. F. Skoriny, 2015. – S. 158-161. [In Russian]
  8. Novikova S.I. Fauna nematod lesnoi podstilki // Uchen. zap. Mosk. gos. ped. in-ta im. V.I. Lenina. – 1971. – Vyp. 456. – S. 124-134. [In Russian]
  9. Ptitca E.Iu. Suktcessionnaia dinamika oribatid v razlagaiushchikhsia pniakh // Fauna i ekologiia bespozvonochnykh zhivotnykh, ch. 1. – M.: MGPI im. V.I Lenina, 1976. – C. 12-19. [In Russian]
  10. Reimers N.F. Okhrana prirody i okruzhaiushchei cheloveka sredy. Slovar-spravochnik. – M.: Prosveshchenie, 1992. – 319 s. [In Russian]
  11. Reimers N.F., Shtilmark F.R. Osobo okhraniaemye prirodnye territorii. – M.: Mysl, 1978. –295 s. [In Russian]
  12. Reshetylo O. Frahmentatsiia oselyshch tvaryn: naslidky ta pidkhody do yii otsiniuvannia // Mat- ly nauk. konf. "Stan i bioriznomanittia ekosystem Shatskoho natsionalnoho pryrodnoho parku" (Shatsk, 11 -14 veresnia 2014 r.). – Lviv: Spolom, 2014 – S. 67-68. [In Ukrainian]
  13. Tishkov A.A. Ekologicheskaia restavratciia narushennykh ekosistem Severa. – M.: Izd-vo URAO, 1996 – 112 s. [In Russian]
  14. Chernova N.M. Zoologicheskaia kharakteristika kompostov. – M.: Nauka, 1966. – 154 c. [In Russian]
  15. Chernova N.M., Burova L.G., Zaprometova K.M. i dr. Suktcessii v lesnoi podstilke // Fauna i ekologiia bespozvonochnykh zhivotnykh. – M.: Izd.-vo MGPI im. V.I. Lenina, 1977. – S. 3-24. [In Russian]
  16. Chornobai Yu.M. Ekolohichni suktsesii detrytu v hirskykh lisovykh ekosystemakh // Pratsi nauk. tov-va im. Shevchenka. – L., 2001. – T. VII: Ekoloh. zb. Ekolohichni problemy pryrodokorystuvannia ta bioriznomanittia Lvivshchyny. – S. 117-128. [In Ukrainian]
  17. Gisin H. Okologie und Lebensgemeinschaften der Collembolen in schweizerischen Exkursionsgebiet Basels. – Rev. Suisse zool., 1943, v. 50.
  18. Chatterjee S. Extinction risk, ecological stress and climate change: how species respond to changes in global biodiversity // hal-00868902, version 1 -2. – 2013. – 11 p.
  19. Fahrig L. Effect of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity // Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. – 2003, vol. 34. – P. 487-515.
  20. Gonzalez-Varo J., Arroyo J., Aparicio A. Effects of fragmentation on pollinator assemblage, pollen limitation and seed production of Mediterranean myrtle (Myrtus communis) // Biological Conservation. – 2009, vol. 142. – P. 1058-1065.
  21. Tsaliki M., Diekmann M. Fitness and survival in fragmented populations of Narthecium ossifragumat the species’ range margin // Acta Oecologica. – 2009, vol. 35. – P. 415-421.
  22. Yaacobi G., Ziv Y. Rosenzweig M.L. Habitat fragmentation may not matter to species diversity // Proceeding of the Royal Society. – B. – 2007, № 274. – P. 2409-2412.

⇧
⇩